ext_33574 (
anbyrobanby.livejournal.com) wrote in
hh_clubs2013-03-31 03:09 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Smarmy Society: Term XXV, Activity 3: Character Replacements

Activity name: Character Replacements
Points: 24hr debate: Participation 10pts, Additional comment: 5pts. 30pts limit.
End date: Monday 1st April @ 14:00 UTC
Details: Over the course of the films, some of the characters were written out, assimilated into others, or played by multiple actors. Do you feel this is the right approach? Does the change of face affect how you feel about that character? A 24 hour debate to end the month.
So I was considering my next activity for the Smarmy Society, when I read on the news that the actor Richard Griffiths, who played Vernon Dursley, passed away on Good Friday following surgery complications.
I was reading some of the assosciated articles related to this, and one thing that came up was how he was perceived as "perfect" for the role of Uncle Vernon. This got me thinking- without doubt he was excellent in the role, but had someone else played the part, would it have still been as good? The thought reminded me of when Richard Harris was replaced by Michael Gambon and the ensuing dissonance.
I would like to invite a quick discussion about the synergy between actor and character. If an actor or actress becomes unavailable, walks away from the project, etc, how would you think this impacts on the character role? Would it change? Does a strong actor or actress fit into the role smoothly, and would a transition be smooth? More importantly to the Smarmy Club, would your view change if it were a major role versus a minor one?
I'll give 10 points for a substantial, thought-out comment (let's say about 200 words, minimum). Further comments of at least 50 words will be awarded five house points.
As it's a topic with broad scope I shall not be assigning debate motions here. I would just like to see some free chatter. But of course, feel free to play devil's advocate with each other. I love to see a bit of that over a circle of people nodding among themselves. ;)
no subject
It's an interesting thing, too- HBC did ultimately own Bellatrix, but I did feel there were times where things were altered round to give her more screentime despite it not having narrative merit (I'm thinking about you, random HBP Burrow attack scene!) I'm fairly sure there were cases of this happening to others, too. I seem to recall how Hermione got a lot of Ron's wiser/more depthful lines, while he remained a goofballsidekick for longer.
rob/gryff
no subject
And ARGH I hate what they did with Ron. They made him positively annoying whereas in the books, it was much more easy to relate to him, he was more nuanced!
Delphine/Claw
no subject
Also, they neutered a lot of Harry's sarcasm/dry wit throughout the course of the series, too!
Emmapuff
no subject
KaityPuff
no subject
Chelsea/Ravenclaw